Iroquois vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,788,489 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.572. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 9.2 Immigrants from Northern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,279 compared to $90,026, a difference of 21.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $105,430, a difference of 20.8%), and median family income ($90,543 compared to $108,161, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 0.64%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $53,185, a difference of 12.2%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $42,084, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 38.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 34.5%), and single female poverty (25.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 29.4%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 21.6%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.1%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.22, a difference of 2.1%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 15.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 36.9%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 32.6%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.2% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 0.18%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 39.6%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 34.3%), and male disability (13.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 3.6%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 13.8%).