Potawatomi vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,666,061 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Potawatomi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.006. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Potawatomi within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Potawatomi corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Immigrants from Northern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,613 compared to $105,430, a difference of 24.6%), median household income ($72,576 compared to $90,026, a difference of 24.0%), and median family income ($88,265 compared to $108,161, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 9.9%), householder income under 25 years ($46,462 compared to $53,185, a difference of 14.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,212 compared to $62,522, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (15.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 32.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 31.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 29.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.21%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.8% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 22.8%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.7%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.080%), family households (63.3% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and married-couple households (45.7% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 42.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 28.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 10.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 23.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 42.1%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 41.5%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.19%), high school diploma (89.0% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 49.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 43.5%), and male disability (14.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.3%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.4%).