Thai vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 311,590,122 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Thai communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.315. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Thais within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Thais corresponds to an increase of 8.6 Immigrants from Northern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Thai and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($72,135 compared to $58,008, a difference of 24.3%), median household income ($110,648 compared to $90,026, a difference of 22.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($129,560 compared to $105,430, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($59,187 compared to $53,185, a difference of 11.3%), median female earnings ($47,577 compared to $42,084, a difference of 13.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($72,099 compared to $62,522, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Thai and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 37.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (11.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 36.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (11.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 5.7%), single male poverty (10.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 11.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Thai and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (3.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 15.2%), and male unemployment (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Thai and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.2% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 0.93%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Thai and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.0% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 22.8%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.3%), and married-couple households (51.9% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.070%), family households (67.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and currently married (50.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Thai and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 54.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 11.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 5.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Thai and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 30.5%), master's degree (21.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 27.2%), and professional degree (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Thai and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 19.9%), ambulatory disability (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.9%), and vision disability (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 2.9%), cognitive disability (16.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 8.1%).