Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,278,736 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 13.5%), householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $64,795, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,058 compared to $103,954, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($104,910 compared to $106,544, a difference of 1.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $106,952, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $57,074, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 21.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 20.9%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 19.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 15.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 17.6%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 11.4%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.4% compared to 68.8%, a difference of 0.56%), average family size (3.43 compared to 3.45, a difference of 0.74%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 4.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.26%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 121.6%), high school diploma (90.8% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and ged/equivalency (87.5% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (63.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.77%), master's degree (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and college, 1 year or more (57.6% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 46.8%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 25.2%), and male disability (12.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.94%), female disability (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.3%).