Immigrants from Panama vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,695,353 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Immigrant from Panama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.499. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Panama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.092% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Panama corresponds to an increase of 92.5 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,451 compared to $103,954, a difference of 16.2%), median household income ($80,873 compared to $93,933, a difference of 16.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,815 compared to $106,952, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($41,853 compared to $42,694, a difference of 2.0%), wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and median male earnings ($51,962 compared to $54,958, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 21.8%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 19.9%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.8%), male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and poverty (13.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 24.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 22.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.58%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.86%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.0% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 17.2%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.6%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 2.9%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.45, a difference of 5.5%), and family households (64.8% compared to 68.8%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 87.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 70.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 8.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.1% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 22.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 47.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 55.5%), master's degree (14.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 14.9%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (63.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), college, 1 year or more (57.6% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 26.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.9%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.55%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.76%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.2%).