Immigrants from Peru vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,163,472 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Immigrant from Peru communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.490. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Peru within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.093% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Peru corresponds to an increase of 93.0 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 12.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,329 compared to $103,954, a difference of 6.8%), and median household income ($89,010 compared to $93,933, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($54,695 compared to $54,958, a difference of 0.48%), householder income under 25 years ($56,384 compared to $57,074, a difference of 1.2%), and per capita income ($43,852 compared to $42,694, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 15.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 12.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.020%), family poverty (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and receiving food stamps (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 26.1%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.2% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.3%), births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.010%), currently married (46.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and married-couple households (47.3% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 50.7%), no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 46.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 34.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 39.5%), master's degree (14.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 20.1%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (63.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.41%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 36.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 15.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.2%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.7%).