Immigrants from Liberia vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,533,591 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Immigrant from Liberia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.436. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Liberia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Liberia corresponds to an increase of 40.6 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,863 compared to $103,954, a difference of 28.6%), median household income ($74,896 compared to $93,933, a difference of 25.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,739 compared to $106,952, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (20.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 9.0%), median female earnings ($37,970 compared to $41,656, a difference of 9.7%), and per capita income ($38,165 compared to $42,694, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 33.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 27.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 41.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 18.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 22.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 30.9%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 29.0%), and married-couple households (40.3% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.45, a difference of 5.6%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 79.7%), no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 56.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 52.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.3% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 21.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 52.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 42.0%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 9.0%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (42.3% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 0.14%), bachelor's degree (33.5% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 0.59%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 50.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 2.9%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and female disability (12.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.9%).