Immigrants from France vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,826,255 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Immigrant from France communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.806. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from France within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.083% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from France corresponds to an increase of 82.6 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,557 compared to $42,694, a difference of 27.8%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 22.2%), and median male earnings ($63,715 compared to $54,958, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($96,743 compared to $93,933, a difference of 3.0%), householder income over 65 years ($66,826 compared to $64,795, a difference of 3.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,257 compared to $103,954, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 21.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 21.0%), and receiving food stamps (10.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), female poverty (12.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 25.5%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 18.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 34.1%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 19.4%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.13%), births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 0.65%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 70.8%), no vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 65.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 5.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 19.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 47.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 90.6%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 83.4%), and professional degree (6.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 81.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 29.0%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.13%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.68%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.9%).