Immigrants from Canada vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,790,435 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Immigrant from Canada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.566. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Canada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Canada corresponds to an increase of 12.9 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 27.1%), per capita income ($49,412 compared to $42,694, a difference of 15.7%), and median male earnings ($60,388 compared to $54,958, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,952 compared to $64,795, a difference of 0.24%), median female earnings ($41,373 compared to $41,656, a difference of 0.69%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,616 compared to $103,954, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.4%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 24.8%), and receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.080%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and single female poverty (20.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 25.5%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 25.6%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 19.2%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.40%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 47.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 28.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.90%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 8.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 114.3%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 44.5%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 57.5%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.040%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.2%).