Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,190,623 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Immigrant from Bangladesh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.835. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bangladesh within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.548% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bangladesh corresponds to an increase of 548.0 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($55,394 compared to $64,795, a difference of 17.0%), median household income ($80,722 compared to $93,933, a difference of 16.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($92,208 compared to $106,952, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($41,709 compared to $42,694, a difference of 2.4%), householder income under 25 years ($54,714 compared to $57,074, a difference of 4.3%), and median female earnings ($39,910 compared to $41,656, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 33.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 32.5%), and receiving food stamps (15.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 14.9%), single female poverty (22.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.7%), and single mother poverty (31.1% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 22.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.0% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.99%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 31.3%), married-couple households (43.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 11.9%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.36 compared to 3.45, a difference of 2.7%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 229.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 147.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 108.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 24.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.8% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 60.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 108.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 24.6%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 18.9%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.010%), 9th grade (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and 6th grade (95.4% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.7%).