Immigrants from Ireland vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,023,415 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Immigrant from Ireland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.593. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ireland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.143% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ireland corresponds to an increase of 143.0 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($56,584 compared to $42,694, a difference of 32.5%), median male earnings ($67,698 compared to $54,958, a difference of 23.2%), and wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,075 compared to $57,074, a difference of 0.0%), householder income over 65 years ($68,495 compared to $64,795, a difference of 5.7%), and median household income ($104,692 compared to $93,933, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 38.1%), receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 32.2%), and single father poverty (17.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.3%), single mother poverty (25.8% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 23.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 20.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (86.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 47.4%), single mother households (5.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 33.0%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.0% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.48%), currently married (48.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 78.6%), no vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 75.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.3% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 50.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 6.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 19.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.3% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 50.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 94.5%), professional degree (6.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 68.5%), and master's degree (20.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 64.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 35.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 22.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.2%).