Crow vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,956,467 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.214% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 214.3 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($63,681 compared to $93,933, a difference of 47.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,337 compared to $103,954, a difference of 45.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $106,952, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 17.5%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $41,656, a difference of 18.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $57,074, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 128.8%), single male poverty (23.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 113.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 104.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 30.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 38.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 230.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 221.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 198.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 27.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 38.3%), single father households (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 29.3%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 68.8%, a difference of 5.3%), average family size (3.82 compared to 3.45, a difference of 10.7%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 41.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 23.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 114.0%), bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 21.6%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 1.3%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and high school diploma (88.4% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 41.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 35.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.17%), disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.4%).