Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,567,277 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 3.0 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($56,709 compared to $42,694, a difference of 32.8%), median male earnings ($70,146 compared to $54,958, a difference of 27.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $103,954, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $57,074, a difference of 8.8%), householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $64,795, a difference of 10.4%), and wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 33.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 29.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (12.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.52%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and single male poverty (10.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 31.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 22.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.72%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 48.4%), single mother households (4.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 37.7%), and births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.6% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 2.9%), family households (66.1% compared to 68.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and currently married (48.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 48.6%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 44.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 18.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 36.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 77.8%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 71.4%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 64.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.86%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 37.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (19.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 25.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 3.2%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 8.4%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 8.8%).