Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,470,843 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.155. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.094% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to an increase of 93.6 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,876 compared to $103,954, a difference of 11.9%), median household income ($85,054 compared to $93,933, a difference of 10.4%), and wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($43,464 compared to $42,694, a difference of 1.8%), median male earnings ($53,237 compared to $54,958, a difference of 3.2%), and median family income ($101,354 compared to $106,544, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 22.8%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 15.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.42%), male poverty (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.65%), and poverty (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 23.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.71%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 14.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.3%), and family households with children (28.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.29%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 48.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 32.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 12.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 31.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 52.8%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 18.0%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (63.2% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.28%), college, 1 year or more (57.5% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 43.9%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.13%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.5%).