Choctaw vs Immigrants from Fiji Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,012,143 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Fiji within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.789. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.033% in Immigrants from Fiji. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 32.8 Immigrants from Fiji.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($69,947 compared to $93,933, a difference of 34.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $103,954, a difference of 33.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $106,952, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $54,958, a difference of 15.1%), per capita income ($35,999 compared to $42,694, a difference of 18.6%), and median earnings ($40,270 compared to $48,305, a difference of 20.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (20.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 56.6%), single male poverty (17.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 55.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 38.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 36.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.61%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 26.4%), divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 21.9%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.16%), currently married (46.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 23.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 13.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.040%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.82%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 93.6%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 15.8%), and bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.1% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.49%), 12th grade, no diploma (89.8% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Fiji communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 0.92%, a difference of 104.2%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 54.5%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 4.2%), cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 8.8%).