Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,399,554 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Immigrant from Bosnia and Herzegovina communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.270. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina corresponds to a decrease of 15.3 Ghanaians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 11.2%), householder income over 65 years ($55,986 compared to $60,043, a difference of 7.2%), and median household income ($79,888 compared to $83,582, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($52,869 compared to $52,810, a difference of 0.11%), per capita income ($42,278 compared to $42,164, a difference of 0.27%), and median family income ($97,432 compared to $98,877, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 23.1%), family poverty (8.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 22.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.2% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 0.41%), single female poverty (21.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 28.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 27.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.8% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 18.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 23.5%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 12.9%), and currently married (46.1% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.5%), family households (61.9% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 65.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 12.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.5%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 9.7%), and master's degree (14.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.50%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 21.2%), male disability (11.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.44%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.9%).