Immigrants from Congo vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Congo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ghanaian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Congo

Ghanaians

Fair
Fair
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,403
SOCIAL INDEX
21.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
261st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ghanaian Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,628,779 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.008. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to a decrease of 5.0 Ghanaians.
Immigrants from Congo Integration in Ghanaian Communities

Immigrants from Congo vs Ghanaian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($66,768 compared to $83,582, a difference of 25.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($77,850 compared to $97,277, a difference of 25.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $90,137, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income over 65 years ($51,393 compared to $60,043, a difference of 16.8%), and median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $40,429, a difference of 17.8%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Ghanaian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CongoGhanaian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,720
Poor
$42,164
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,216
Poor
$98,877
Median Household Income
Tragic
$66,768
Fair
$83,582
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,169
Average
$46,440
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$44,204
Poor
$52,810
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,317
Excellent
$40,429
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$43,266
Good
$52,594
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$72,178
Tragic
$90,137
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$77,850
Poor
$97,277
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,393
Fair
$60,043
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
22.3%

Immigrants from Congo vs Ghanaian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 24.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (22.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 23.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 1.4%), single male poverty (13.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 6.2%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Ghanaian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CongoGhanaian
Poverty
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
13.9%
Families
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
10.3%
Males
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Tragic
17.4%
Tragic
14.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.6%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
14.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.9%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
18.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
22.4%
Tragic
18.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Males
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Tragic
25.3%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Poor
16.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.8%
Fair
29.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
12.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
14.0%

Immigrants from Congo vs Ghanaian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 27.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 6.0%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Ghanaian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CongoGhanaian
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Males
Average
5.3%
Tragic
6.1%
Females
Average
5.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.5%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.2%

Immigrants from Congo vs Ghanaian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 17.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.99%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Ghanaian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CongoGhanaian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.7%
Tragic
35.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Good
83.0%

Immigrants from Congo vs Ghanaian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 11.5%), married-couple households (39.0% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.7%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (27.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.4%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Ghanaian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CongoGhanaian
Family Households
Tragic
59.2%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
39.0%
Tragic
42.2%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
7.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.1%
Tragic
42.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.8%
Tragic
34.3%

Immigrants from Congo vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 63.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.050%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 7.6%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CongoGhanaian
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Tragic
16.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Tragic
83.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.1%
Tragic
48.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
16.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.2%

Immigrants from Congo vs Ghanaian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 22.9%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 16.6%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.3% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.0%), 8th grade (94.9% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.0%), and 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.050%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Ghanaian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CongoGhanaian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Tragic
92.8%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Tragic
91.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Tragic
87.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Tragic
84.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.7%
Poor
63.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.6%
Fair
58.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.8%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.6%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Fair
4.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Average
1.8%

Immigrants from Congo vs Ghanaian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.1%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 2.5%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.6%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Ghanaian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CongoGhanaian
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.3%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.0%
Poor
24.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.7%
Fair
47.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.2%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Average
2.5%