Immigrants from Western Africa vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 185,471,337 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Immigrant from Western Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Western Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Western Africa corresponds to an increase of 29.1 Ghanaians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($49,621 compared to $52,594, a difference of 6.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($92,384 compared to $97,277, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,676 compared to $90,137, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 1.3%), median female earnings ($39,351 compared to $40,429, a difference of 2.7%), and median earnings ($44,893 compared to $46,440, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 5.3%), family poverty (10.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.30%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.59%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 16.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.49%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.0% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 5.0%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.12%), family households (63.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.51%), and family households with children (28.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 9.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.4% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 7.9%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.030%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Africa and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.4%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.53%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.94%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.8%).