Chickasaw vs Ghanaian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Ghanaian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Ghanaians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,403
SOCIAL INDEX
21.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
261st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ghanaian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,345,272 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.423. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.085% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 84.5 Ghanaians.
![Chickasaw Integration in Ghanaian Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-ghanaians/chickasaw-vs-ghanaians-community-integration.webp)
Chickasaw vs Ghanaian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 21.6%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $83,582, a difference of 19.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $97,277, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $52,810, a difference of 10.4%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $60,043, a difference of 11.7%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $46,440, a difference of 14.2%).
![Chickasaw vs Ghanaian Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-ghanaians/chickasaw-vs-ghanaians-income.webp)
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Ghanaian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Poor $42,164 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Poor $98,877 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Fair $83,582 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Average $46,440 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Poor $52,810 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Excellent $40,429 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Good $52,594 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $90,137 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Poor $97,277 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Fair $60,043 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Chickasaw vs Ghanaian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 23.1%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 21.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 4.9%).
![Chickasaw vs Ghanaian Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-ghanaians/chickasaw-vs-ghanaians-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Ghanaian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.9% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 10.3% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 14.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 20.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 14.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 18.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 18.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 13.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Poor 16.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Fair 29.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 12.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.0% |
Chickasaw vs Ghanaian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.8%).
![Chickasaw vs Ghanaian Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-ghanaians/chickasaw-vs-ghanaians-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Ghanaian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.0% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 6.1% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 11.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Chickasaw vs Ghanaian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.3%).
![Chickasaw vs Ghanaian Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-ghanaians/chickasaw-vs-ghanaians-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Ghanaian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 67.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 35.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 74.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Good 83.0% |
Chickasaw vs Ghanaian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.7%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.7%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.29, a difference of 3.0%).
![Chickasaw vs Ghanaian Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-ghanaians/chickasaw-vs-ghanaians-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Ghanaian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 63.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 42.2% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.29 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.8% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 42.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Average 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 34.3% |
Chickasaw vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 109.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 41.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 10.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 23.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 35.7%).
![Chickasaw vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-ghanaians/chickasaw-vs-ghanaians-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Ghanaian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 16.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 83.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 48.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 16.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 5.2% |
Chickasaw vs Ghanaian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 51.0%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 36.0%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.41%), ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.57%), and high school diploma (88.4% compared to 87.7%, a difference of 0.83%).
![Chickasaw vs Ghanaian Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-ghanaians/chickasaw-vs-ghanaians-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Ghanaian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 94.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 92.8% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 90.0% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 87.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 84.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Poor 63.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Fair 58.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Fair 45.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Average 38.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Good 15.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Fair 4.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Average 1.8% |
Chickasaw vs Ghanaian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 75.6%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 44.1%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.4%).
![Chickasaw vs Ghanaian Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-ghanaians/chickasaw-vs-ghanaians-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Ghanaian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Excellent 11.5% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Average 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Poor 24.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Fair 47.5% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Good 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Average 2.5% |