Slavic vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,810,860 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.660. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.361% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 1,361.2 Ghanaians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 22.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,377 compared to $90,137, a difference of 6.9%), and per capita income ($45,049 compared to $42,164, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,613 compared to $40,429, a difference of 2.1%), median earnings ($47,470 compared to $46,440, a difference of 2.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,709 compared to $60,043, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 31.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 28.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.18%), single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 0.69%), and single female poverty (21.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.0%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 21.6%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 33.7%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 13.2%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.81%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.29, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 83.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 9.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 20.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 55.0%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and college, under 1 year (66.7% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (15.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.21%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.97%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 34.2%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 16.6%), and male disability (12.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.10%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.8%).