Immigrants from Philippines vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,232,807 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Immigrant from Philippines communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.660. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Philippines within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Philippines corresponds to a decrease of 9.8 Ghanaians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,910 compared to $90,137, a difference of 14.2%), median household income ($93,899 compared to $83,582, a difference of 12.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,471 compared to $97,277, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,114 compared to $40,429, a difference of 1.7%), median earnings ($48,266 compared to $46,440, a difference of 3.9%), and per capita income ($44,000 compared to $42,164, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 31.8%), receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 30.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.5% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 10.9%), single female poverty (18.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 16.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 17.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.9%), married-couple households (49.3% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 16.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 92.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 62.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 9.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 25.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 45.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (13.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 14.1%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 12.5%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (91.5% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.92%), disability (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.3%).