Immigrants from Scotland vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Scotland
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ghanaian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Scotland

Ghanaians

Excellent
Fair
9,011
SOCIAL INDEX
87.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
36th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,403
SOCIAL INDEX
21.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
261st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ghanaian Integration in Immigrants from Scotland Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 108,758,539 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.528. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.117% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 117.5 Ghanaians.
Immigrants from Scotland Integration in Ghanaian Communities

Immigrants from Scotland vs Ghanaian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 28.6%), per capita income ($49,893 compared to $42,164, a difference of 18.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,089 compared to $90,137, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $52,594, a difference of 0.080%), median female earnings ($41,771 compared to $40,429, a difference of 3.3%), and median earnings ($50,741 compared to $46,440, a difference of 9.3%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Ghanaian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ScotlandGhanaian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,893
Poor
$42,164
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$114,392
Poor
$98,877
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,091
Fair
$83,582
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,741
Average
$46,440
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,220
Poor
$52,810
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,771
Excellent
$40,429
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,638
Good
$52,594
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,089
Tragic
$90,137
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,175
Poor
$97,277
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,620
Fair
$60,043
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.7%
Exceptional
22.3%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Ghanaian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 55.1%), family poverty (7.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 40.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.17%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and single mother poverty (27.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 6.3%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Ghanaian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ScotlandGhanaian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.9%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
10.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
14.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.6%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
14.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.7%
Tragic
18.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
18.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.0%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.4%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.7%
Poor
16.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.6%
Fair
29.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Tragic
12.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
14.0%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Ghanaian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.4%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.2%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.3%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Ghanaian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ScotlandGhanaian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.6%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.2%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Ghanaian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.37%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Ghanaian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ScotlandGhanaian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.2%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.5%
Tragic
35.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.7%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Good
83.0%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Ghanaian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 42.9%), married-couple households (49.3% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 16.6%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.71%), family households (64.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.12 compared to 3.29, a difference of 5.2%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Ghanaian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ScotlandGhanaian
Family Households
Excellent
64.7%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
42.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.12
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
7.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
42.9%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Tragic
34.3%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 97.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 27.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 9.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 22.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.0%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ScotlandGhanaian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
16.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.8%
Tragic
83.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.9%
Tragic
48.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.8%
Tragic
16.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.7%
Tragic
5.2%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Ghanaian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 57.0%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.6%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.99%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.0%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Ghanaian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ScotlandGhanaian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.2%
Tragic
92.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Tragic
91.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Tragic
87.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.2%
Tragic
84.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.4%
Poor
63.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.4%
Fair
58.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.6%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.3%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.4%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Fair
4.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Average
1.8%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Ghanaian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 30.8%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 13.5%), and cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), female disability (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and disability (11.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.2%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Ghanaian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ScotlandGhanaian
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Good
12.0%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.6%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.7%
Poor
24.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Fair
47.5%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.2%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Good
6.0%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Average
2.5%