Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,305,494 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.362. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.046% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 45.6 Ghanaians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $90,137, a difference of 42.2%), per capita income ($56,709 compared to $42,164, a difference of 34.5%), and median household income ($111,519 compared to $83,582, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 14.3%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $52,594, a difference of 18.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $60,043, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 54.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 54.1%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 8.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 12.4%), and single father poverty (14.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 42.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 33.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 62.3%), births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 45.3%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.82%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households (66.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 45.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 51.3%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 50.8%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.040%), 5th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.050%), and 8th grade (94.9% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 42.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 35.2%), and disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 2.3%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.3%).