Chickasaw vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,769,422 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 16.0 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 18.6%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,132, a difference of 12.0%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $74,205, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($36,475 compared to $36,690, a difference of 0.59%), median earnings ($40,672 compared to $40,193, a difference of 1.2%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $35,114, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 22.3%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 20.9%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.24%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.78%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.5%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 12.5%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.32%), currently married (46.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.69%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 21.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 0.16%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 46.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 33.8%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.84%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.84%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 46.0%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 33.1%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 4.4%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.0%).