Icelander vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,496,400 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.590. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.234% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 233.6 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,987 compared to $36,690, a difference of 22.6%), median male earnings ($55,415 compared to $45,607, a difference of 21.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,261 compared to $85,187, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,247 compared to $50,132, a difference of 2.2%), householder income over 65 years ($61,270 compared to $56,768, a difference of 7.9%), and median female earnings ($39,109 compared to $35,114, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.6%), receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 24.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.32%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 35.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 23.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 29.7%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 20.2%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.0% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 2.1%), currently married (47.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (63.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.010%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 0.72%), and no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 81.9%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 63.5%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.78%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.79%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 16.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 16.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.46%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.91%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.2%).