Australian vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,373,432 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.690. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.532% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 531.7 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $36,690, a difference of 41.9%), median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $45,607, a difference of 37.8%), and median family income ($118,440 compared to $87,387, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $50,132, a difference of 7.2%), householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $56,768, a difference of 17.8%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 23.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 35.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.9%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.24%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 28.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 28.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 38.0%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 29.1%), and births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.8%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households (62.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 19.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.56%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 112.4%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 101.2%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 78.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.90%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.90%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 23.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 22.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.6%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.3%).