Thai vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,734,978 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Thai communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.258. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Thais within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Thais corresponds to a decrease of 4.4 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Thai and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($72,135 compared to $45,607, a difference of 58.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($121,778 compared to $79,956, a difference of 52.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($129,560 compared to $85,187, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($59,187 compared to $50,132, a difference of 18.1%), householder income over 65 years ($72,099 compared to $56,768, a difference of 27.0%), and wage/income gap (30.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 33.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Thai and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 61.7%), receiving food stamps (8.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 60.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 58.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.8%), single father poverty (14.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Thai and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 46.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (3.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 24.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Thai and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Thai and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 56.1%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 37.6%), and births to unmarried women (24.0% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.36, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (30.6% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Thai and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.3%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 0.57%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Thai and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 145.0%), master's degree (21.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 111.0%), and professional degree (6.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 110.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.64%), 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Thai and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 54.2%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 38.6%), and ambulatory disability (4.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 8.0%), cognitive disability (16.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 9.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 12.4%).