Malaysian vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,481,486 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.081% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to an increase of 80.8 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($50,772 compared to $45,607, a difference of 11.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,517 compared to $85,187, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,291 compared to $79,956, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,244 compared to $56,768, a difference of 2.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,615 compared to $50,132, a difference of 3.0%), and median female earnings ($37,298 compared to $35,114, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 9.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (18.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 8.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.040%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.75%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.85%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 10.0%), births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.53%), and currently married (45.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 23.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 29.0%), master's degree (12.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 16.9%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.2% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.070%), 7th grade (94.8% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and 5th grade (96.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 11.0%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.2%).