Russian vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,880,456 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.196. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to a decrease of 10.8 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,154 compared to $36,690, a difference of 44.9%), median male earnings ($63,939 compared to $45,607, a difference of 40.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,398 compared to $79,956, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,389 compared to $50,132, a difference of 8.5%), householder income over 65 years ($67,626 compared to $56,768, a difference of 19.1%), and wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 36.1%), family poverty (7.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 35.9%), and receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 32.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 28.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 49.7%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 36.1%), and births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.0%), married-couple households (48.2% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and currently married (48.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 30.8%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 22.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 126.1%), professional degree (6.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 116.4%), and master's degree (19.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 89.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.84%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.85%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 29.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 27.6%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.2%), disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 7.8%).