Taiwanese vs Fijian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Taiwanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Fijian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Taiwanese

Fijians

Good
Fair
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,167
SOCIAL INDEX
29.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
230th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Fijian Integration in Taiwanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 17,246,699 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.811. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 4.174% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to an increase of 4,174.2 Fijians.
Taiwanese Integration in Fijian Communities

Taiwanese vs Fijian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,492 compared to $79,956, a difference of 26.9%), per capita income ($46,455 compared to $36,690, a difference of 26.6%), and median family income ($107,295 compared to $87,387, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,804 compared to $50,132, a difference of 0.66%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,894 compared to $56,768, a difference of 10.8%).
Taiwanese vs Fijian Income
Income MetricTaiwaneseFijian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,455
Tragic
$36,690
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,295
Tragic
$87,387
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,900
Tragic
$74,205
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,902
Tragic
$40,193
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,556
Tragic
$45,607
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,576
Tragic
$35,114
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,804
Tragic
$50,132
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$101,492
Tragic
$79,956
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,180
Tragic
$85,187
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,894
Tragic
$56,768
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Exceptional
22.9%

Taiwanese vs Fijian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 37.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 34.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 6.7%).
Taiwanese vs Fijian Poverty
Poverty MetricTaiwaneseFijian
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Tragic
13.7%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
10.1%
Males
Good
11.0%
Tragic
12.6%
Females
Good
13.1%
Tragic
14.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Average
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
15.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
19.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
18.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
18.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Tragic
18.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
23.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.5%
Tragic
31.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
13.0%

Taiwanese vs Fijian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 52.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 40.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.7%).
Taiwanese vs Fijian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTaiwaneseFijian
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Good
5.2%
Females
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
3.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.6%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%

Taiwanese vs Fijian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 19.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 2.3%).
Taiwanese vs Fijian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTaiwaneseFijian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
78.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.8%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Tragic
83.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
80.2%

Taiwanese vs Fijian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 36.7%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.9%), and births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.29%), currently married (45.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.36, a difference of 4.0%).
Taiwanese vs Fijian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTaiwaneseFijian
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
29.0%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Fair
46.1%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Exceptional
3.36
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Poor
45.8%
Fair
46.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.0%
Fair
32.3%

Taiwanese vs Fijian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 22.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 11.0%).
Taiwanese vs Fijian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTaiwaneseFijian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
9.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.4%
Exceptional
90.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Exceptional
57.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.0%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
7.8%

Taiwanese vs Fijian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 83.1%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 70.1%), and master's degree (16.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 56.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.020%).
Taiwanese vs Fijian Education Level
Education Level MetricTaiwaneseFijian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.3%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Tragic
94.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Tragic
94.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Tragic
93.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Tragic
91.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.3%
Tragic
90.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Tragic
88.2%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Tragic
86.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
81.6%
College, Under 1 year
Good
66.4%
Tragic
57.7%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.7%
Tragic
51.3%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
47.7%
Tragic
37.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.0%
Tragic
28.7%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.1%
Tragic
10.3%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
2.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.1%

Taiwanese vs Fijian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 34.3%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 26.5%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.60%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.4%).
Taiwanese vs Fijian Disability
Disability MetricTaiwaneseFijian
Disability
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
12.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.7%
Tragic
27.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
17.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
6.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%