White/Caucasian vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,715,373 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Fijians within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.353. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to a decrease of 5.8 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 24.5%), median male earnings ($53,925 compared to $45,607, a difference of 18.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,091 compared to $85,187, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,336 compared to $50,132, a difference of 0.41%), householder income over 65 years ($58,847 compared to $56,768, a difference of 3.7%), and median female earnings ($37,531 compared to $35,114, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.7%), receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 17.7%), and single father poverty (18.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 1.5%), single female poverty (22.7% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 45.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.5% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 25.6%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.8%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.36, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.060%), family households (65.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 35.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 55.6%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 52.2%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.91%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 39.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.38%), female disability (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.63%), and disability (13.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.4%).