Burmese vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,651,534 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.024. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to a decrease of 1.8 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($65,236 compared to $45,607, a difference of 43.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $85,187, a difference of 42.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($113,701 compared to $79,956, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $50,132, a difference of 9.3%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 22.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $56,768, a difference of 25.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 50.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 50.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.88%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 42.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 23.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.61%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 17.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 47.7%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 36.0%), and births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.24%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.36, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.12%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 133.5%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 109.9%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 91.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.53%), 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and 2nd grade (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 43.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 30.9%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.1%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 6.8%).