Immigrants from China vs Alaskan Athabascan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Alaskan Athabascan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Alaskan Athabascans
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
5.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Alaskan Athabascan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,442,741 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,807,044 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 14.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 0.78% |
| Maximum | 26.5% | 69.0% |
| Range | 23.9% | 68.2% |
| Mean | 11.9% | 21.7% |
| Median | 11.5% | 15.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.0% | 28.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 16.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 16.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 16.3% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Slavic (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |