Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,353,227 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.201. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 15.3 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($111,519 compared to $76,383, a difference of 46.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $88,446, a difference of 44.9%), and per capita income ($56,709 compared to $39,163, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 0.94%), householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $62,330, a difference of 14.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $51,713, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 84.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 75.6%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 61.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 4.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and single mother poverty (24.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 24.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 96.4%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 86.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 86.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 48.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 84.3%), births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 60.0%), and single mother households (4.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.050%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.20%), and family households (66.1% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 38.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 24.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 84.4%), master's degree (20.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 76.8%), and professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 68.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.0%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 100.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 91.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 81.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.9%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 9.8%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 54.0%, a difference of 16.1%).