Lithuanian vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Lithuanians

Alaskan Athabascans

Excellent
Fair
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Lithuanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,123,631 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.994. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.749% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 749.0 Alaskan Athabascans.
Lithuanian Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

Lithuanian vs Alaskan Athabascan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,448 compared to $39,163, a difference of 26.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,484 compared to $90,951, a difference of 23.7%), and median male earnings ($61,228 compared to $49,748, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $51,713, a difference of 3.6%), householder income over 65 years ($65,209 compared to $62,330, a difference of 4.6%), and median female earnings ($42,108 compared to $37,905, a difference of 11.1%).
Lithuanian vs Alaskan Athabascan Income
Income MetricLithuanianAlaskan Athabascan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,448
Tragic
$39,163
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,395
Tragic
$94,429
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,852
Tragic
$76,383
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,991
Tragic
$43,393
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,228
Tragic
$49,748
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,108
Tragic
$37,905
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,552
Fair
$51,713
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,223
Tragic
$88,446
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,484
Tragic
$90,951
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,209
Excellent
$62,330
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.7%
Average
25.8%

Lithuanian vs Alaskan Athabascan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 56.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 53.2%), and receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.6%), single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 17.0%).
Lithuanian vs Alaskan Athabascan Poverty
Poverty MetricLithuanianAlaskan Athabascan
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
13.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
10.1%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.7%
Tragic
22.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
19.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.0%
Tragic
17.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Tragic
18.3%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
23.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.3%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Tragic
30.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Good
10.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
14.7%

Lithuanian vs Alaskan Athabascan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 98.1%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 97.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 95.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 5.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 11.5%).
Lithuanian vs Alaskan Athabascan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLithuanianAlaskan Athabascan
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.7%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
9.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Fair
17.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
11.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
10.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
8.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
8.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
7.4%
Seniors > 65
Average
5.1%
Tragic
7.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.9%
Tragic
11.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.3%

Lithuanian vs Alaskan Athabascan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 2.8%).
Lithuanian vs Alaskan Athabascan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLithuanianAlaskan Athabascan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
76.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.4%
Exceptional
45.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.0%
Exceptional
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.8%
Tragic
82.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
81.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
81.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
81.8%

Lithuanian vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 59.9%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 34.5%), and births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 3.6%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.27, a difference of 5.2%).
Lithuanian vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLithuanianAlaskan Athabascan
Family Households
Fair
64.0%
Tragic
61.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
43.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.27
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.0%
Tragic
44.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
13.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.6%
Tragic
37.7%

Lithuanian vs Alaskan Athabascan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 84.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 27.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 5.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 9.1%).
Lithuanian vs Alaskan Athabascan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLithuanianAlaskan Athabascan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
86.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.2%
Average
55.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Exceptional
8.1%

Lithuanian vs Alaskan Athabascan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 53.3%), bachelor's degree (42.2% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 46.6%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.060%), 5th grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and 4th grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.080%).
Lithuanian vs Alaskan Athabascan Education Level
Education Level MetricLithuanianAlaskan Athabascan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.9%
Fair
85.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.8%
Tragic
61.0%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.9%
Tragic
53.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.6%
Tragic
36.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.2%
Tragic
28.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
11.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Poor
1.7%

Lithuanian vs Alaskan Athabascan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 58.9%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 54.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.6%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 8.3%).
Lithuanian vs Alaskan Athabascan Disability
Disability MetricLithuanianAlaskan Athabascan
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
14.4%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
14.9%
Females
Average
12.2%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
9.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.8%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
32.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Tragic
54.0%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.3%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Poor
2.5%