Immigrants from Mexico vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,246,448 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.100. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to an increase of 0.7 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,801 compared to $62,330, a difference of 18.0%), per capita income ($33,931 compared to $39,163, a difference of 15.4%), and median female earnings ($33,236 compared to $37,905, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 1.9%), householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $51,713, a difference of 2.6%), and median household income ($73,160 compared to $76,383, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 28.0%), married-couple family poverty (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (22.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.9%), receiving food stamps (15.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and single female poverty (25.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 68.4%), male unemployment (5.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 66.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 60.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 28.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.7% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.0% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (31.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 14.7%), family households (69.1% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 11.8%), and single mother households (8.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.5% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 0.23%), births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 0.65%), and married-couple households (46.4% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 91.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 12.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 6.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 148.6%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 55.2%), and professional degree (2.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 2.5%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 75.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 43.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.97%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and disability age over 75 (51.1% compared to 54.0%, a difference of 5.6%).