Immigrants from Morocco vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,467,858 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Morocco communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.213. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Morocco within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Morocco corresponds to an increase of 27.7 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,430 compared to $39,163, a difference of 18.6%), median household income ($87,930 compared to $76,383, a difference of 15.1%), and median male earnings ($56,958 compared to $49,748, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($60,647 compared to $62,330, a difference of 2.8%), householder income under 25 years ($54,593 compared to $51,713, a difference of 5.6%), and wage/income gap (24.1% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 49.7%), single male poverty (12.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 31.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 86.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 85.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 83.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 24.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.8% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 55.3%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 24.2%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.0% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 0.31%), married-couple households (44.2% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (45.4% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 58.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 34.5%), and no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 9.7%), and no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 53.9%), master's degree (17.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 47.6%), and bachelor's degree (41.4% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.93%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 92.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 49.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.43%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 10.1%).