White/Caucasian vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,812,693 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.365. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.081% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to a decrease of 81.5 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 10.7%), median male earnings ($53,925 compared to $49,748, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,091 compared to $90,951, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,531 compared to $37,905, a difference of 1.0%), householder income under 25 years ($50,336 compared to $51,713, a difference of 2.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,668 compared to $88,446, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 32.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 30.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.5%), single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and single female poverty (22.7% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 96.7%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 95.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 86.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.5% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 41.2%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 19.7%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.39%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.27, a difference of 3.8%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 121.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 2.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (35.3% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 22.4%), associate's degree (44.2% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 21.1%), and master's degree (13.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.35%), 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 44.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 33.5%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 3.5%).