Nicaraguan vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,228,027 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Nicaraguan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nicaraguans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nicaraguans corresponds to a decrease of 5.2 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,474 compared to $62,330, a difference of 14.4%), wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 10.0%), and median household income ($79,737 compared to $76,383, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,372 compared to $39,163, a difference of 0.53%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($87,751 compared to $88,446, a difference of 0.79%), and median earnings ($43,026 compared to $43,393, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 41.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 31.9%), and single male poverty (12.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (18.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.54%), single mother poverty (29.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 91.6%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 90.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 90.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.73%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 39.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 27.9%), family households (67.4% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.92%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.95%), and currently married (44.2% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 61.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 100.7%), bachelor's degree (33.1% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 15.0%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (53.9% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 0.90%), nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 95.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 61.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 53.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.5%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 54.0%, a difference of 11.8%).