Native Hawaiian vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,841,899 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.254. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 10.4 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($89,919 compared to $76,383, a difference of 17.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $90,951, a difference of 15.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $62,330, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 1.3%), median female earnings ($38,461 compared to $37,905, a difference of 1.5%), and median earnings ($45,027 compared to $43,393, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 45.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 35.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 6.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 12.8%), and receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 92.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 86.4%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 73.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.69%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 21.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.70%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 35.3%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 19.4%), and married-couple households (49.1% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.51%), average family size (3.43 compared to 3.27, a difference of 5.0%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 102.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 16.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 7.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 11.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (43.1% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 18.2%), bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 15.2%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 0.0%), 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and high school diploma (90.8% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 44.4%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 43.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.88%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 6.8%).