Immigrants from Dominica vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 18,664,022 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Immigrant from Dominica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.157. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Dominica within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.221% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Dominica corresponds to a decrease of 220.8 Alaskan Athabascans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.0% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 28.7%), householder income over 65 years ($50,071 compared to $62,330, a difference of 24.5%), and median family income ($85,411 compared to $94,429, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,825 compared to $37,905, a difference of 0.21%), median earnings ($42,420 compared to $43,393, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,301 compared to $51,713, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 45.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 27.2%), and family poverty (12.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (23.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 1.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 55.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 50.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and female unemployment (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.5% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 39.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 10.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 36.8%), single mother households (8.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 19.5%), and married-couple households (39.4% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.27, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (63.4% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 92.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 60.0%), and no vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.8% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 10.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (41.6% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 32.6%), and no vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 42.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 93.1%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 24.0%), and bachelor's degree (32.5% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (52.5% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 1.7%), nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 101.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 48.9%), and male disability (11.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.040%), ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.91%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 2.2%).