Celtic vs Alaskan Athabascan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Alaskan Athabascan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Celtics

Alaskan Athabascans

Average
Fair
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,687
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
246th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Alaskan Athabascan Integration in Celtic Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,864,557 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.555. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.399% in Alaskan Athabascans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 399.2 Alaskan Athabascans.
Celtic Integration in Alaskan Athabascan Communities

Celtic vs Alaskan Athabascan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,621 compared to $39,163, a difference of 11.4%), median male earnings ($54,242 compared to $49,748, a difference of 9.0%), and median household income ($83,193 compared to $76,383, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,283 compared to $37,905, a difference of 1.0%), householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $51,713, a difference of 2.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,608 compared to $62,330, a difference of 2.8%).
Celtic vs Alaskan Athabascan Income
Income MetricCelticAlaskan Athabascan
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,621
Tragic
$39,163
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,139
Tragic
$94,429
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,193
Tragic
$76,383
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,732
Tragic
$43,393
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,242
Tragic
$49,748
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,283
Tragic
$37,905
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,447
Fair
$51,713
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,241
Tragic
$88,446
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,896
Tragic
$90,951
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,608
Excellent
$62,330
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Average
25.8%

Celtic vs Alaskan Athabascan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 34.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 31.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.2%), single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and single female poverty (22.7% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 3.9%).
Celtic vs Alaskan Athabascan Poverty
Poverty MetricCelticAlaskan Athabascan
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Tragic
13.6%
Families
Good
8.8%
Tragic
10.1%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Average
13.4%
Tragic
14.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
22.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
19.1%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
17.9%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.4%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Tragic
17.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Tragic
18.3%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
23.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.9%
Tragic
30.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Good
10.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
13.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
14.7%

Celtic vs Alaskan Athabascan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 96.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 91.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 85.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.72%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 9.6%).
Celtic vs Alaskan Athabascan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCelticAlaskan Athabascan
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.7%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
9.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Fair
17.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
11.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
10.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.7%
Tragic
8.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Tragic
8.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
7.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
11.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.3%

Celtic vs Alaskan Athabascan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 2.4%).
Celtic vs Alaskan Athabascan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCelticAlaskan Athabascan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.8%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Tragic
76.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.3%
Exceptional
45.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Exceptional
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Tragic
82.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Tragic
81.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
81.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
81.8%

Celtic vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 45.0%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 19.1%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (63.8% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.5%).
Celtic vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCelticAlaskan Athabascan
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Tragic
61.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Tragic
43.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Exceptional
3.27
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Tragic
3.4%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
44.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
13.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Tragic
37.7%

Celtic vs Alaskan Athabascan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 93.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 13.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 7.2%).
Celtic vs Alaskan Athabascan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCelticAlaskan Athabascan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.1%
Tragic
86.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.2%
Average
55.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
8.1%

Celtic vs Alaskan Athabascan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 28.5%), master's degree (14.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 27.5%), and associate's degree (45.8% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.050%), 11th grade (93.7% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and high school diploma (90.6% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.32%).
Celtic vs Alaskan Athabascan Education Level
Education Level MetricCelticAlaskan Athabascan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
97.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
97.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.6%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.7%
Fair
85.3%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Tragic
61.0%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
53.4%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Tragic
36.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Tragic
28.8%
Master's Degree
Average
14.8%
Tragic
11.6%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Poor
1.7%

Celtic vs Alaskan Athabascan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 43.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 33.4%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.96%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.6%).
Celtic vs Alaskan Athabascan Disability
Disability MetricCelticAlaskan Athabascan
Disability
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
14.4%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
14.9%
Females
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.6%
Tragic
9.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.2%
Tragic
32.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.2%
Tragic
54.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
3.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
5.3%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Poor
2.5%