Dutch West Indian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,854,662 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Dutch West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.816. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Dutch West Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.654% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Dutch West Indians corresponds to an increase of 653.6 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($81,852 compared to $108,830, a difference of 33.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,171 compared to $104,992, a difference of 32.6%), and per capita income ($35,922 compared to $47,394, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 3.9%), householder income under 25 years ($45,816 compared to $51,914, a difference of 13.3%), and median female earnings ($34,106 compared to $41,527, a difference of 21.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 48.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 47.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.6%), single father poverty (19.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 19.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 34.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 33.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.7% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.5% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 26.6%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.7%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.3%), family households (64.3% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.8%), no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 0.010%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 70.2%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 64.1%), and master's degree (10.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 64.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.14%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 60.6%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 50.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 46.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.4%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 21.5%).