Immigrants from Poland vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,492,908 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from Poland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.085. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Poland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Poland corresponds to an increase of 1.0 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,474 compared to $51,914, a difference of 6.9%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,041 compared to $63,643, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($108,570 compared to $108,830, a difference of 0.24%), median female earnings ($41,630 compared to $41,527, a difference of 0.25%), and median household income ($90,549 compared to $89,496, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 15.8%), single male poverty (11.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 9.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 11.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.40%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.3%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.44%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (65.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.78%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.6% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 30.9%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.6%), and master's degree (15.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.23%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 11.3%), cognitive disability (16.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.21%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 0.65%), and disability (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.1%).