Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Scotland
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Scotland

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Excellent
Exceptional
9,011
SOCIAL INDEX
87.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
36th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Immigrants from Scotland Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,346,743 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.760. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.609% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to an increase of 609.3 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Immigrants from Scotland Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 13.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,089 compared to $97,880, a difference of 7.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,175 compared to $104,992, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,771 compared to $41,527, a difference of 0.59%), householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $51,914, a difference of 1.4%), and median earnings ($50,741 compared to $48,913, a difference of 3.7%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ScotlandImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,893
Exceptional
$47,394
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$114,392
Exceptional
$108,830
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,091
Exceptional
$89,496
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,741
Exceptional
$48,913
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,220
Exceptional
$57,352
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,771
Exceptional
$41,527
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,638
Fair
$51,914
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,089
Excellent
$97,880
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,175
Exceptional
$104,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,620
Exceptional
$63,643
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.7%
Good
25.3%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.63%), single mother poverty (27.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and single female poverty (19.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 2.9%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ScotlandImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.6%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.7%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.0%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.4%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.7%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.6%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
9.9%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 15.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.31%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ScotlandImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.6%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.2%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.22%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ScotlandImmigrants from Zimbabwe
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.2%
Exceptional
66.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.5%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.7%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Exceptional
83.4%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.3%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and married-couple households (49.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 0.20%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.73%), and family households (64.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.9%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ScotlandImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Family Households
Excellent
64.7%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.3%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.12
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Good
6.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Excellent
30.3%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 18.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 8.9%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ScotlandImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.3%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.8%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.9%
Good
55.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.8%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.7%
Poor
6.0%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.5%), ged/equivalency (88.2% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and high school diploma (91.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (50.6% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 0.21%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ScotlandImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.2%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Exceptional
90.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.2%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.4%
Exceptional
68.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.4%
Exceptional
63.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.6%
Exceptional
50.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.3%
Exceptional
42.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.4%
Exceptional
17.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%

Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 13.8%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 12.9%), and cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.12%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.86%).
Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ScotlandImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.6%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Good
47.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Good
3.0%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.2%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Good
6.0%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%