Immigrants from Peru vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,430,635 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from Peru communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.032. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Peru within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Peru corresponds to an increase of 1.7 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($56,384 compared to $51,914, a difference of 8.6%), per capita income ($43,852 compared to $47,394, a difference of 8.1%), and median family income ($103,534 compared to $108,830, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($89,010 compared to $89,496, a difference of 0.55%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,329 compared to $97,880, a difference of 0.57%), and wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 24.5%), receiving food stamps (12.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 21.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 14.4%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.2% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 0.76%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.9%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.0%), and family households (67.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.4% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.65%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (47.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 16.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 34.8%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 26.0%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.69%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.70%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.8%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 9.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 0.14%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.61%).