Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Excellent
Exceptional
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,021,098 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.858. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.237% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 236.8 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Luxembourger Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 8.3%), householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $63,643, a difference of 4.4%), and median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $41,527, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,237 compared to $97,880, a difference of 0.66%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $104,992, a difference of 1.4%), and median male earnings ($56,300 compared to $57,352, a difference of 1.9%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Exceptional
$47,394
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Exceptional
$108,830
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Exceptional
$89,496
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Exceptional
$48,913
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Exceptional
$57,352
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Exceptional
$41,527
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Fair
$51,914
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Excellent
$97,880
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Exceptional
$104,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Exceptional
$63,643
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Good
25.3%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.5%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 12.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.5%), single female poverty (20.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.2%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.9%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 17.5%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.2%), and female unemployment (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.2%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 19.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.6%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Zimbabwe
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
66.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
83.4%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.9%), currently married (49.3% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.28%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.52%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.8%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Good
6.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Excellent
30.3%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 84.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 9.3%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Good
55.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Poor
6.0%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 17.4%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.2%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.33%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.34%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Exceptional
90.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Exceptional
68.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Exceptional
63.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
50.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Exceptional
42.6%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Exceptional
17.4%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
2.2%

Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 9.7%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.26%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.63%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.70%).
Luxembourger vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Good
11.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Good
47.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Good
3.0%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.3%