Aleut vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

COMPARE

Aleut
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Aleuts

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Fair
Exceptional
3,609
SOCIAL INDEX
33.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
216th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Aleut Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,791,649 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Aleut communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.734. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Aleuts within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.273% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Aleuts corresponds to an increase of 273.4 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Aleut Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

Aleut vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,210 compared to $47,394, a difference of 12.3%), median male earnings ($51,168 compared to $57,352, a difference of 12.1%), and median earnings ($44,241 compared to $48,913, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,708 compared to $63,643, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($50,377 compared to $51,914, a difference of 3.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,052 compared to $104,992, a difference of 4.9%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
Income MetricAleutImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,210
Exceptional
$47,394
Median Family Income
Poor
$98,702
Exceptional
$108,830
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,446
Exceptional
$89,496
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,241
Exceptional
$48,913
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,168
Exceptional
$57,352
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,719
Exceptional
$41,527
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,377
Fair
$51,914
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,370
Excellent
$97,880
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Average
$100,052
Exceptional
$104,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,708
Exceptional
$63,643
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.7%
Good
25.3%

Aleut vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 28.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 27.9%), and single female poverty (25.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.26%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.1%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
Poverty MetricAleutImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Poverty
Fair
12.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Poor
9.5%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Poor
11.8%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Average
13.4%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.3%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.9%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Tragic
15.4%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.4%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.9%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
9.9%

Aleut vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 58.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 48.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.1%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
Unemployment MetricAleutImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Unemployment
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
21.2%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.3%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%

Aleut vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.95%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricAleutImmigrants from Zimbabwe
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Exceptional
66.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.2%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.4%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.0%
Exceptional
83.4%

Aleut vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 35.8%), births to unmarried women (39.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 29.7%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.7% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.010%), family households (63.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.3%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
Family Structure MetricAleutImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.6%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.8%
Good
6.2%
Currently Married
Average
46.7%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.5%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
39.3%
Excellent
30.3%

Aleut vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 32.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 2.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.6%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricAleutImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.0%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
87.5%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
54.1%
Good
55.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.2%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Poor
6.0%

Aleut vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 48.6%), master's degree (11.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 47.8%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.1% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.010%), high school diploma (90.4% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and 6th grade (97.7% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.38%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
Education Level MetricAleutImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.4%
Exceptional
90.3%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.6%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.2%
Exceptional
68.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.4%
Exceptional
63.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
39.6%
Exceptional
50.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
42.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
17.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.2%

Aleut vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Aleut and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 44.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 29.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.5%).
Aleut vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
Disability MetricAleutImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Disability
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.4%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.6%
Good
47.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.3%
Good
3.0%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.3%