Chippewa vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,085,635 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.906. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.024% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 24.5 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $47,394, a difference of 29.4%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $89,496, a difference of 26.9%), and median family income ($86,852 compared to $108,830, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 1.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $51,914, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $63,643, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 47.9%), receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 47.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.1%), single father poverty (18.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 16.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 87.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 50.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 40.5%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.8%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.32%), family households (62.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 25.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.51%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 52.7%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 52.0%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.5% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 56.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 40.5%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.6%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.8%).