U.S. Virgin Islander vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,215,454 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in U.S. Virgin Islanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 U.S. Virgin Islanders corresponds to an increase of 8.0 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($85,294 compared to $108,830, a difference of 27.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,736 compared to $104,992, a difference of 26.9%), and per capita income ($37,589 compared to $47,394, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,448 compared to $51,914, a difference of 9.4%), median female earnings ($36,424 compared to $41,527, a difference of 14.0%), and wage/income gap (21.5% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 66.2%), married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 53.0%), and family poverty (12.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 12.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 13.5%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 32.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 30.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 39.7%), births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 30.5%), and married-couple households (39.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.19, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 56.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 30.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.5% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 17.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 24.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 47.8%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 43.9%), and master's degree (13.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.50%), 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.52%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 21.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 20.5%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.37%), disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.4%).